Eurocardsharing

Go Back   Eurocardsharing > General Discussions > General Discussions > Forum Suggestions

Forum Suggestions Discussion, Do we want a oscam local sharing section at General Discussions forum; Hey at all users!! we need some people to take part in this poll! Do we want a oscam local ...

View Poll Results: Do we want a oscam local sharing section?? yes / no??
yes 167 84.34%
no 31 15.66%
Voters: 198. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Do we want a oscam local sharing section
Old
  (#1)
cold007
Super Moderator
 
cold007's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 9,448

Level: 63 [♥ Bé-Yêu ♥♥ Bé-Yêu ♥♥ Bé-Yêu ♥♥ Bé-Yêu ♥♥ Bé-Yêu ♥]
Life: 314 / 1570
Magic: 3149 / 50515
Experience: 82%

Thanks: 5,191
Thanked 4,424 Times in 2,537 Posts
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: germany -unterfranken..
Do we want a oscam local sharing section - 26-February-2013, 00:09

Hey at all users!!


we need some people to take part in this poll!


Do we want a oscam local sharing section??

yes or no !... no need for comments!

Let it be known....

when an oscam local section and ONLY a LOCAL oscam section eventualy is opened... i give you notification now..rule 22 getting caught manipulating a peer in any way..will be handled with a no questions asked ban!


cold007


dreambox 8000- box with icvs images!!

remember u SPAM = i BAN

activley hunting nline stealers...!

beware...of with whom you share!!





Last edited by cold007; 26-February-2013 at 00:12..
   
The Following 17 Users Say Thank You to cold007 For This Useful Post:
<<<Keep on Keepin on>>> (06-March-2013), antoniojvl (25-September-2013), bertp (15-March-2014), dabs (26-February-2013), firelighter (23-March-2013), gekko1ro (07-March-2013), gianluca68 (06-March-2013), keano (26-February-2013), lexlexus (19-March-2013), Nordik2007 (10-March-2013), qwertz (06-April-2013), route (01-March-2013), silla (02-March-2013), simon30000 (07-March-2013), skin64 (01-March-2013), wiesl66 (28-December-2013), zwolli (06-April-2013)
Oscam&Cacheex
Old
  (#2)
mumbua
Donator
 
mumbua's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 75

Level: 7 [♥ Bé-Yêu ♥♥ Bé-Yêu ♥♥ Bé-Yêu ♥♥ Bé-Yêu ♥♥ Bé-Yêu ♥]
Life: 0 / 164
Magic: 25 / 4637
Experience: 59%

Thanks: 11
Thanked 24 Times in 18 Posts
Join Date: Sep 2008
Oscam&Cacheex - 26-February-2013, 09:45

Its Time to accept Oscam as Cardsharing Emu.
I use Oscam as standalone Emu now for 6 Months. I even use Cacheex a very good Cache adon at Oscam. Cacheex make the Line strong and with the right Config 100% freezefree.
Is not possible to steel Cards like now with CCCAM. To ignore Sharelevel like now with CCCam.
Is better to try Oscam/Cacheex, after everybody will delete CCCAM. Maybe komplett Newbies will get Problem, because Oscam/Cacheex is a bit more komplicate then CCCAm.
In the Moment very view Insider use Osacm as standalone Share-Emu.
At Oscam/Cacheex is a Position Waittime. This you have to use, to ask first Cache after the Question goes to the Card.
But this Feature is a Problem for Peoples only see the ECM-Time.
The ECM-Time comes higher. My SkyUk Card has a ECM-Time from 80-90.
With waittime 150 is ECM Time 230-240.
My Sky-de Card has a ECM-Time from about 700. With Waittime 900
is the ECM-Time 1600.
I write this because i got today a PM my ECM-Time is to high. And to delete our Lines.
Here a Example was shows the Oscam-Log:
(1702&000000/0000/07FF/93:2C2DAE61B63BD9A074D43C2C20D545CC.D9FDE49A.0F128 7A8D851456E0E1AED15621263D7): found (1595 ms) by skyde2-local-camd35 (P/1/1/2) - Animax (real 645 ms)
Here a log from my SkyUk Card.
2013/02/26 09:33:08 C247E0 c roi (0963&000000/0000/107B/5F:DA672129040CC62959101EA52A16EE11.C4E8ABCC.70A66 E84D00276480000000000000000): cache3 (161 ms) by (0/0/1/4) - Sky Sports 3 (wait_time over)
At the Log i find nothing goes to the Card. All ECM-Questions answer from Cache.
That means my Card will newer be overloadet. And will be 100 % Freezefree.
And Freezefree is more important than showing low ECM-Time. Because the real ECM-Time is low.

Last edited by mumbua; 26-February-2013 at 09:55.. Reason: Correctur
   
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to mumbua For This Useful Post:
migu (18-July-2013), sky190176 (18-March-2013), velociraptor (10-October-2015), wiesl66 (03-January-2016)
Sponsored Links
Old
  (#3)
sleepy1958
Senior Member
 
sleepy1958's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 108

Level: 9 [♥ Bé-Yêu ♥]
Life: 0 / 210
Magic: 36 / 4877
Experience: 40%

Thanks: 57
Thanked 45 Times in 34 Posts
Join Date: May 2010
26-February-2013, 10:30

Looking at the amount of users that have switched to or are considering switching to Oscam it would be a good idea to have an Oscam sharing section.

I'm sure there quite a few members (mostly new members) are a little confused as to the omission of an Oscam share section.

My vote is yes, go for it.
   
Old
  (#4)
Freakie
Donator
 
Freakie's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 156

Level: 11 [♥ Bé-Yêu ♥♥ Bé-Yêu ♥♥ Bé-Yêu ♥]
Life: 0 / 263
Magic: 52 / 7710
Experience: 54%

Thanks: 26
Thanked 40 Times in 25 Posts
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Germany
26-February-2013, 20:41

yes!

I would like to get rid off cccam/oscam and use pure OSCAM.


OSCAM on Ubuntu 16.4LTS, 24/7, 100Mbit VDSL
0d95,50800,43800,41f00,32500,1830,0648,0b00,
01000068 (09c4 full but married currently)
   
Old
  (#5)
keano
ECS Master
 
keano's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 537

Level: 21 [♥ Bé-Yêu ♥♥ Bé-Yêu ♥♥ Bé-Yêu ♥♥ Bé-Yêu ♥]
Life: 0 / 508
Magic: 179 / 17109
Experience: 34%

Thanks: 125
Thanked 276 Times in 131 Posts
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Europe
26-February-2013, 20:52

When you consider that there has been no update for CCcam for many many months and oscam has updates every week and also the fact that CCcam does not work with all channels/providers like oscam does then it makes sense to have a oscam section.
   
Old
  (#6)
cold007
Super Moderator
 
cold007's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 9,448

Level: 63 [♥ Bé-Yêu ♥♥ Bé-Yêu ♥♥ Bé-Yêu ♥♥ Bé-Yêu ♥♥ Bé-Yêu ♥]
Life: 314 / 1570
Magic: 3149 / 50515
Experience: 82%

Thanks: 5,191
Thanked 4,424 Times in 2,537 Posts
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: germany -unterfranken..
01-March-2013, 17:39

47 people...have voted...???

wtf ??

i know of 500 people...that advirtise in locals sections..with cards..that are only readable with oscam??


strange for sure...

my 2 cents...


cold007


dreambox 8000- box with icvs images!!

remember u SPAM = i BAN

activley hunting nline stealers...!

beware...of with whom you share!!




   
The Following User Says Thank You to cold007 For This Useful Post:
simon30000 (07-March-2013)
Old
  (#7)
Barney2222
Super Moderator
 
Barney2222's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 13,380

Level: 71 [♥ Bé-Yêu ♥♥ Bé-Yêu ♥♥ Bé-Yêu ♥♥ Bé-Yêu ♥♥ Bé-Yêu ♥]
Life: 526 / 1756
Magic: 4460 / 56136
Experience: 26%

Thanks: 4,306
Thanked 3,543 Times in 2,014 Posts
Join Date: May 2007
Location: http://www.eurocardsharing.com
Post 01-March-2013, 20:30

Quote:
Originally Posted by cold007 View Post
47 people...have voted...???

wtf ??

i know of 500 people...that advirtise in locals sections..with cards..that are only readable with oscam??


strange for sure...

my 2 cents...


cold007
i go with the small majority but hope that this important decision is not gonna be abused ,
the reason i have voted is because im being realistic and understand Oscam is supported but CCcam support ended long time ago
and Oscam support is almost on a daily bassis

Most channels and providers these days simply do require oscam to work so lets vote but understand the reason for voting ,
there is a genuine reason why we do now basically require an Oscam sharing section for obvious reasons thnxs to providers changing scrambling methods to thier encryption but not a reason to abuse or fake cards with tricks .

So let your voice be heard if you do wish for Oscam sharing section or not whatever happens if enuff interest then it will go ahead ..when not enuff Votes then no reason to add this section in future times YOU Decide .

Have a nice weekend @all
--
Barney2222




-------------------------------------------------
If you like what i post then please Use the "Thanks Button"

iMPORTANT PLEASE READ :
All Peers offline for more than 48 hours without notice will be automatic deleted.!!.
   
The Following 13 Users Say Thank You to Barney2222 For This Useful Post:
ASEK (06-March-2013), Charly20 (02-March-2013), cold007 (01-March-2013), Darth Vader (24-March-2013), gianluca68 (06-March-2013), Greatone (08-March-2013), mattch (23-April-2014), Nordik2007 (10-March-2013), omangelo45 (22-March-2013), RavenNilox (06-March-2013), remi2000 (20-March-2013), simon30000 (07-March-2013), tattooman (12-March-2013)
Old
  (#8)
svenni
Donator
 
svenni's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 225

Level: 14 [♥ Bé-Yêu ♥♥ Bé-Yêu ♥♥ Bé-Yêu ♥♥ Bé-Yêu ♥]
Life: 0 / 325
Magic: 75 / 10881
Experience: 1%

Thanks: 185
Thanked 37 Times in 26 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2006
06-March-2013, 10:11

i too have participated in the Poll. let us see!! i am also ttrying to understand OS Cam little more because, my Via. card has probs. and my ICE is not read by CCCAM lower Versions. just for Personal interest, can we start a discusion here

" what are the Positives and Negatives that OS Cam with CCCam!"

thanks and have a nice day...........Svenni.

i will start,

1. most of the cards are read by OSCam without Probs....
   
Old
  (#9)
cold007
Super Moderator
 
cold007's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 9,448

Level: 63 [♥ Bé-Yêu ♥♥ Bé-Yêu ♥♥ Bé-Yêu ♥♥ Bé-Yêu ♥♥ Bé-Yêu ♥]
Life: 314 / 1570
Magic: 3149 / 50515
Experience: 82%

Thanks: 5,191
Thanked 4,424 Times in 2,537 Posts
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: germany -unterfranken..
06-March-2013, 10:24

only 62 people...in 10 days! .....

yet...9 / 10 people..posting in the locals sections...

MUST USE OSCAM...to read thier cards...


for you lazy people... that dont participate...

i would read rule 14 very carefuly!

Quote:
14) When requesting shares in the Gbox, Mbox or CCcam Exchange Local Thread / Locals on Newcs, you MUST write your Local Card in the Thread Subject.

604,9cd,963,1810,seca, conax, nds, and and and.....


cold007


dreambox 8000- box with icvs images!!

remember u SPAM = i BAN

activley hunting nline stealers...!

beware...of with whom you share!!





Last edited by cold007; 06-March-2013 at 11:40..
   
The Following 20 Users Say Thank You to cold007 For This Useful Post:
<<<Keep on Keepin on>>> (06-March-2013), antonio5600 (15-March-2013), bonno (06-March-2013), capepanwa (08-March-2013), digicon (07-March-2013), dvdman (09-March-2013), Fear-na-Boinne (15-May-2017), firelighter (07-March-2013), gianluca68 (06-March-2013), gothia (30-July-2016), greatman (03-June-2014), Greatone (08-March-2013), kromi (30-December-2013), nopayserver (06-March-2013), ProCal (13-November-2016), RavenNilox (06-March-2013), remi2000 (20-March-2013), ritait14 (22-March-2013), simon30000 (07-March-2013), svenni (06-March-2013)
Old
  (#10)
iWici
Member
 
iWici's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 95

Level: 8 [♥ Bé-Yêu ♥]
Life: 0 / 193
Magic: 31 / 5374
Experience: 73%

Thanks: 17
Thanked 59 Times in 31 Posts
Join Date: Oct 2008
06-March-2013, 18:32

First of all, thanx for considering section for oscam!
I haven't voted yet, because just oscam section in sharing locals, won't give anything in my opinion.
As per
Quote:
Originally Posted by cold007 View Post
MUST USE OSCAM...to read thier cards...
you defined right, they must use oscam to read their card, but there is no oscam protocol to share. Oscam users sharing mostly thru cccam protocol, but can share other protocols too.
Or you suggest to do oscam section with subsections for oscam-cccam, oscam-newcamd, etc?
Way complicated I think.
I do not know, is there actually any difference for cccam or mgcamd users, if they sharing with oscam user thru cccam or newcamd protocol?
If yes, then may-be changing the rule, that oscam users must mark out using oscam is enough.
   
Closed Thread

Bookmarks


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Forum Jump



ECS on RSS ECS on Twitter ECS on Facebook ECS on Youtube
Follow us on:

Powered by vBulletin
Copyright 2002 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Dreambox