Eurocardsharing

Go Back   Eurocardsharing > General Discussions > General Discussions > Forum Suggestions

Forum Suggestions Discussion, Do we want a oscam local sharing section at General Discussions forum; For me is oscam section creat idea.I like cccam protocol,but cccam software dont read my 093E viasat card,256 isnt option ...

View Poll Results: Do we want a oscam local sharing section?? yes / no??
yes 167 84.34%
no 31 15.66%
Voters: 198. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old
  (#21)
rbr999
Donator
 
rbr999's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 63

Level: 6 [♥ Bé-Yêu ♥♥ Bé-Yêu ♥♥ Bé-Yêu ♥♥ Bé-Yêu ♥]
Life: 0 / 145
Magic: 21 / 3035
Experience: 82%

Thanks: 32
Thanked 7 Times in 3 Posts
Join Date: Oct 2010
Age: 38
17-March-2013, 20:20

For me is oscam section creat idea.I like cccam protocol,but cccam software dont read my 093E viasat card,256 isnt option for me.My best peers are cccam users,but i cant share with them without oscam.....
And here,in this forum we see very much 093E + other cards what we cant read directly in cccam,but we are sharing them in cccam section.So we need oscam section.If we dont create that section today,then aftertomarrow we have problem,at least i think so.


Golden media 990 Spark reload;Technotrend TT-budget 3200 S-2;Dreambox 500s; 36E;28,2E:23,5E;19,2E;13E;9E;4,8E;0,8W;4W.
   
Old
  (#22)
jakas
ECS Master
 
jakas's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 1,227

Level: 30 [♥ Bé-Yêu ♥♥ Bé-Yêu ♥♥ Bé-Yêu ♥♥ Bé-Yêu ♥♥ Bé-Yêu ♥]
Life: 0 / 736
Magic: 409 / 21823
Experience: 47%

Thanks: 320
Thanked 283 Times in 210 Posts
Join Date: Oct 2007
17-March-2013, 20:46

and how will you share with oscam giving out N:lines ???
Biggest fakers are using oscam to reshare locals, make locals overide reshare
Why are there so many ppl write about high ecm from Viaccess cards or so many strange viaccess requests.
I dont know all the benefits of oscam I voted NO.
i HAVE BEEN here for 6 years now and during the past year we have max number of fakers
Come on just see the posts in the cccam section
Oscam is necessary for so many cards it has is + but many ------ minuses too

Last edited by jakas; 17-March-2013 at 20:50..
   
Sponsored Links
Old
  (#23)
rbr999
Donator
 
rbr999's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 63

Level: 6 [♥ Bé-Yêu ♥♥ Bé-Yêu ♥♥ Bé-Yêu ♥♥ Bé-Yêu ♥]
Life: 0 / 145
Magic: 21 / 3035
Experience: 82%

Thanks: 32
Thanked 7 Times in 3 Posts
Join Date: Oct 2010
Age: 38
17-March-2013, 21:17

Jakas,
[newcamd]
port = [email protected]:000000
key = 0102030405060708091011121314
mgclient =1
These are oscam settings,to use newcamd protocol,how to create n-line you know,or i just didnt understand your question...
I have only two peers left who is connected with n-line,last ones i removed because they was cardfakers.
I etc,dont have other chance than oscam to use cccam protocol for sharing.
I agree with you,that oscam is best to fake cards,ignore reshare and do what ever.
And also i agree that oscam has very much pluses and minuses too.


Golden media 990 Spark reload;Technotrend TT-budget 3200 S-2;Dreambox 500s; 36E;28,2E:23,5E;19,2E;13E;9E;4,8E;0,8W;4W.
   
Old
  (#24)
cold007
Super Moderator
 
cold007's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 9,448

Level: 63 [♥ Bé-Yêu ♥♥ Bé-Yêu ♥♥ Bé-Yêu ♥♥ Bé-Yêu ♥♥ Bé-Yêu ♥]
Life: 314 / 1570
Magic: 3149 / 48796
Experience: 82%

Thanks: 5,191
Thanked 4,423 Times in 2,537 Posts
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: germany -unterfranken..
17-March-2013, 21:28

if your using oscam...

then why would you even need a nline?

n-lines are a long time no go... mostly only used between friends...

there will be a nline sticky in an oscam section...as in every other..

i perfer a cline in oscam over an nline everyday...as if the newcamd user dosent have a ...perfect... service list--> it *****... other then showing it as a local...

which can be done with the other protocols too..

cold007






dreambox 8000- box with icvs images!!

remember u SPAM = i BAN

activley hunting nline stealers...!

beware...of with whom you share!!




   
The Following User Says Thank You to cold007 For This Useful Post:
SteveAustin (20-March-2013)
Old
  (#25)
loliix
Member
 
loliix's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 98

Level: 8 [♥ Bé-Yêu ♥]
Life: 0 / 197
Magic: 32 / 5782
Experience: 89%

Thanks: 15
Thanked 44 Times in 31 Posts
Join Date: Dec 2007
17-March-2013, 22:04

Filled under suggestions:
1 - Maybe there could be a section for Oscam under the current "Cccam protocol" (split the Local into two, one for official CCcam, the other for Oscam)
2 - Very important, those who post under that section cannot have "stealth" enabled (on top of defeating the whole point of using Oscam, it would also make it much harder to "police" if the peers are using the proper sections)

I'm actually looking forward to this, I don't think it will change anything regarding the fakers/dishonest peers, but may finally encourage a mass migration to the more recent and supported Oscam (more and more Oscam isn't just a choice, it's really the only way to read the card -- staying with the official CCcam is, by the other hand, a choice which can be changed).

I do am a bit skeptical about the "practicality" of enforcing this split (I foresee a lot of work to keep it clean), but I am looking increasingly favorable to this (I had already voted yes, albeit with another mindset).

Last edited by loliix; 17-March-2013 at 22:09..
   
The Following User Says Thank You to loliix For This Useful Post:
c22net (18-March-2013)
Old
  (#26)
karolina
ECS Master
 
karolina's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 1,915

Level: 36 [♥ Bé-Yêu ♥♥ Bé-Yêu ♥♥ Bé-Yêu ♥♥ Bé-Yêu ♥]
Life: 88 / 883
Magic: 638 / 24892
Experience: 35%

Thanks: 59
Thanked 847 Times in 523 Posts
Join Date: Apr 2008
17-March-2013, 22:12

I think is one very biger " + " from create oscam section if user post topic about exchange im will be know whot have. Now people who used cccam no have this posibility he mast used semi-way to see whot have.


If you like this post, press Thank You button
   
Old
  (#27)
cold007
Super Moderator
 
cold007's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 9,448

Level: 63 [♥ Bé-Yêu ♥♥ Bé-Yêu ♥♥ Bé-Yêu ♥♥ Bé-Yêu ♥♥ Bé-Yêu ♥]
Life: 314 / 1570
Magic: 3149 / 48796
Experience: 82%

Thanks: 5,191
Thanked 4,423 Times in 2,537 Posts
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: germany -unterfranken..
17-March-2013, 23:25

ok guys...

i have extened the poll to the end of march....


you guys decide......


cold007


dreambox 8000- box with icvs images!!

remember u SPAM = i BAN

activley hunting nline stealers...!

beware...of with whom you share!!




   
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to cold007 For This Useful Post:
Barney2222 (17-March-2013), firelighter (18-March-2013), Volsus (18-April-2013)
!!
Old
  (#28)
costibardash
Junior Member
 
costibardash's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 8

Level: 1 [♥ Bé-Yêu ♥]
Life: 0 / 18
Magic: 2 / 456
Experience: 73%

Thanks: 5
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Join Date: Jun 2009
!! - 18-March-2013, 01:02

Good news if admin create a section for oscam!!!

Creating Oscam cache ex section is also a very good ideea!!


please vote!!!
   
Old
  (#29)
vince
Mmmm beer!
 
vince's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 134

Level: 10 [♥ Bé-Yêu ♥♥ Bé-Yêu ♥]
Life: 0 / 240
Magic: 44 / 7601
Experience: 62%

Thanks: 7
Thanked 38 Times in 18 Posts
Join Date: Feb 2007
18-March-2013, 13:09

Great initiative! If such a section is opened, I suggest including a mandatory RECENT picture that outlines the entitlements of a user's card(s). This can potentially reduce the number of cardfakers as it's something that is VERY easy to do in Oscam. Also, the use of N or C-lines should be reconsidered. The newcamd protocol is quicker than Cccam as it is less chatty. Also, a cache-ex section would be great! :)


My ECS values:
1. I don't share with VPS servers;
2. I prefer that you actually read my posts prior to sending me a PM!
   
Old
  (#30)
loliix
Member
 
loliix's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 98

Level: 8 [♥ Bé-Yêu ♥]
Life: 0 / 197
Magic: 32 / 5782
Experience: 89%

Thanks: 15
Thanked 44 Times in 31 Posts
Join Date: Dec 2007
18-March-2013, 16:47

Although being with the best intentions, if that policy of a mandatory picture of the card entitlements is enforced I foresee a lot of troubles ahead with people forgetting to edit out the serial number of their cards and "scouts" of the TV providers reporting home to terminate those cards.

To fight card fakers, mandating that each peer mentions in every post/PM his card ECM times could be more effective. We should know the average ECM time for that card in particular (so we can see beforehand if something is off). Then, once connected to the peer, we just add the measured "ping" to his reported ECM time and voil: that should be just about the ECM time at our box -- if it consistently deviates too much then the peer has some explaining to do.

Something I would also make mandatory is mentioning (in every post/PM) the version number of the emu being used. That should go for every emu out there, not just Oscam.
   
Closed Thread

Bookmarks


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Forum Jump



ECS on RSS ECS on Twitter ECS on Facebook ECS on Youtube
Follow us on:

Powered by vBulletin
Copyright 2002 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Dreambox