Go Back   Eurocardsharing > General Discussions > General Satellite News > Latest Satellite News

Latest Satellite News Discussion, New Soccer TV rights in 'satellite battle' at General Satellite News forum; Soccer TV rights in 'satellite battle' Every month or two some hapless British pub landlord gets hit with a fine ...

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
New Soccer TV rights in 'satellite battle'
Bacteria's Avatar
Posts: 96,015

Level: 124 [♥ Bé-Yêu ♥♥ Bé-Yêu ♥♥ Bé-Yêu ♥♥ Bé-Yêu ♥♥ Bé-Yêu ♥]
Life: 4638 / 4638
Magic: 32005 / 104778
Experience: 68%

Thanks: 1,107
Thanked 5,578 Times in 1,419 Posts
Join Date: Oct 2006
Age: 37
New Soccer TV rights in 'satellite battle' - 10-November-2008, 12:00

Soccer TV rights in 'satellite battle'

Every month or two some hapless British pub landlord gets hit with a fine for showing soccer matches without having paid BSkyBs special fee covering licensed premises. Many landlords have cheekily started showing foreign signals of English Premiership matches (which they argue need only a normal French, German or other subscription). A high-profile test case is currently meandering through the legal system ahead of a hearing some time in the future before the European Court.

Last week a London High Court heard applications from Setanta, Canal Plus, BSkyB and the anti-piracy division of the Motion Pictures Association, along with European soccer governing body UEFA, arguing that their voices should also be heard in a case involving the English Premier League and QC Leisure.

A Portsmouth licensee, Karen Murphy, is at the core of a case where she and others are appealing a decision made against them back on Dec 17 last year for allegedly accessing QC Leisures so-called World Feed and where QC claims to hold rights to foreign broadcasters games, according to the High Court summary.

However, foreign broadcasters are required by the terms of their licence agreement with the Claimant to undertake to procure that no device is knowingly authorised or enabled by or with their authority or that of their sub-licensees, distributors, agents employees etc so as to permit anyone to view in an intelligible form any such transmission outside their particular licensed territory. Hence the case, and the appeal.

British licensed trade daily newspaper The Publican quotes Mark Brealey QC, speaking on behalf of UEFA, warning that if excluded from the test case, expected to be heard next summer, the body could launch a separate case to challenge the final verdict.

Brealey said: The Premier League is interested in the Premier League. It can present a similar solution but it has no interest in the Champions League. If refused this intervention UEFA could bring a similar claim of its own. All that UEFA is doing [by launching the intervention] is bypassing the need to bring a separate claim raising similar issues, wasting the courts time and burdening the defendants.

He added that if the intervention is rejected and the European Court of Justice finds in favour of the use of decoding cards the effect on UEFAs commercial interests would be direct and substantial.

James Flynn QC, arguing BSkyBs corner, said: It is evident that Sky will be affected by the interpretation to be given at the Court of Justice. We are the most directly affected as decoding cards are supplied as a way to avoid paying subscriptions to Sky. Setantas submission focused on the need to retain exclusivity for broadcasters like itself, which have recently broken into the market.
Reply With Quote


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Forum Jump

ECS on RSS ECS on Twitter ECS on Facebook ECS on Youtube
Follow us on:

Powered by vBulletin
Copyright 2002 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.