Go Back   Eurocardsharing > General Discussions > General Satellite News > Latest Satellite News

Latest Satellite News Discussion, Update Stop picking on Sky! at General Satellite News forum; Stop picking on Sky! Last week assorted UK regulators delivered three heavyweight punches to BSkyB. I just wonder if it ...

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Update Stop picking on Sky!
Bacteria's Avatar
Posts: 96,015

Level: 124 [♥ Bé-Yêu ♥♥ Bé-Yêu ♥♥ Bé-Yêu ♥♥ Bé-Yêu ♥♥ Bé-Yêu ♥]
Life: 4638 / 4638
Magic: 32005 / 104160
Experience: 68%

Thanks: 1,107
Thanked 5,578 Times in 1,419 Posts
Join Date: Oct 2006
Age: 37
Update Stop picking on Sky! - 06-October-2008, 13:20

Stop picking on Sky!

Last week assorted UK regulators delivered three heavyweight punches to BSkyB. I just wonder if it isnt time to stop picking on Sky?

First, the broadcaster was ordered to sell down its stake in ITV. Then it emerged that BSkyB might have to fully dispose of what might then be a minority shareholding in ITV. Finally, and most important of all, and following a 21 month enquiry it was determined that Sky has market power in the industry, and might have to wholesale its expensively won premium channels to third party rivals.

Lets be absolutely clear, Sky is without doubt a huge force in UK broadcasting, especially in terms of its Blue Riband sports coverage. By common acclaim the fortunes it has ploughed into English soccer and other sports has revolutionised their leagues and tournaments. Sky, of course, is not a charity: it has secured TV rights in order to close out other would-be operators, but it has maximized viewing enjoyment, covering events in a breathtaking fashion.

And in the process it has built its viewers to 9m subscribing homes, achieved over the past 18 or so years, and the largest number of DTH pay-subscribers in the world outside North America. Technically, its pioneering work in interactivity is praised and imitated around the world. Its move into HDTV (and some 30 channels by year-end) and MPEG4 leaves its other UK pay-TV rivals floundering in its wake.

Copying, or at best imitating, BSkyBs test-bed pay-TV model goes on all over the world. Indeed, its alumni former staffers are frequently to be found running other pay-TV operations just about everywhere, such is their best of breed knowledge.

Who else can create this best of breed performance? The complaint about market domination came from the UKs Gang of Four, Virgin Media, Setanta, British Telecom and minnow Top-Up TV.

Lets take a look at them in turn. How about hapless Virgin Media? Virgin was a top loser last week on the Nasdaq, where its share price has tumbled from $16 to $6.84 over the past four months giving it a current Market Capitalisation of $2.2bn (a miserable 1.24bn) and still not achieving profits (it lost 333m in Q2 this year, or $588m, to June 30) as it continues to lay a strong foundation for future growth, in the words of CEO Neil Berkett in August. Not a bad statement for a company that in the form of NTL went belly-up in May 2002 with debts of $18bn (then the largest-ever debt default in US corporate history).

Indeed, Virgin Media has yet to make a profit of any substance. Its ARPU is down (now 41.63 compared with 42.16 a year ago, a significant fall, especially when you consider inflation rates over the past two years. Virgin Media has $10bn of long-term debt around its throat. Its senior managers must also be hugely relieved that its plan to take a large slice of ITV two years ago was thwarted by Sky (which has taken a 600m hit on its 17.9% stake to date).

Virgin Media, along with a few other rivals to BSkyB, wants to see Sky broken up, and one must ask who might pick up the pieces? Setanta Sports, the cheeky Irish consortium has been something of a thorn in Skys side this past two years. It has competed vigorously for soccer rights, sending core TV rights up in the process. Last week Setanta filed the accounts of its UK wholesale subsidiary, and reported that losses rose to 3.1m in 2007, a four-fold increase on 2006 losses and pushing accumulated losses to 4.6m. A spokesman for Setanta Sports said the UK entity, which is one of a number of subsidiaries operated by the Dublin-based broadcaster, wholesales Setanta's channels in the UK. This would include sales to cable TV operator Virgin Media, which carries some Setanta stations as part of its basic digital offering. Most of Setantas profits flow into its Irish (or perhaps now Luxembourg-based) parent company, as it tries to minimise tax losses.

But its been no great secret that Setanta has been trying to sell itself. Bankers Goldman Sachs were looking earlier this year when times were better for some cash-rich investor prepared to stump up $2bn for a non-profitable business. Possible buyers included British Telecom (which would have used it as a marketing tool for its BT Fusion broadband IPTV service) and Disney-ESPN. The talks seemingly came to nothing.

Top-Up TV is a small pay-TV player, founded by two very highly-regarded former BSkyB heavyweights, David Chance, deputy CEO, and Ian West MD of Sky Entertainment. Top-Up offered a theoretical 23 channels of content mostly drawn from people like Virgin Media, Disney and MTV Networks, and now played out as a best of service on the UKs Freeview digital-terrestrial service. This multiplicity of programmes are all shoehorned into 4.5 channels of actual bandwidth. But it also offers Setanta Sports 1 amongst its bundle as well as NBC-Us Picture Box movie service. Assorted ventures (Top-Up TV Pay as you Go, Xtraview) have been abandoned. In May 2006 it restructured itself, putting the old business in liquidation with reported losses of 7m.

Ofcom, thankfully, rejected these assorted calls for Sky to be broken up, and insiders seem not to be too fazed about having to sell its unique sports (and movies) packages to its rivals. Virgin, after all, covers only a small portion of the UK, while BT is hamstrung by the technical limitations of DSL. Meanwhile, Sky is already pushing its pre-Christmas sign up for HDTV offers, thereby guaranteeing that it keeps hold of the cream of the crop in terms of its core sports fanatics.

Currently BSkyBs wholesale income is a mere four per cent of its revenues, says Goldman Sachs Laurie Davidson, who suggests that if Sky is forced to cut say 10% from its wholesale terms would impact BSkyBs earnings per share by just three per cent. Unpleasant, but far from catastrophic.

The bigger question is whether Sky would then continue to pay top-dollar for exclusive sports rights. If its rivals knew they would gain access to Skys entire premium content then why would they even enter the bidding frame? In other words the people who might suffer here would not be BSkyB, or fans generally, but the actual sports leagues themselves.

So, my suggestion to Ofcom and the other meddlers in Skys business is to leave well alone. Encourage Sky to compete aggressively with its REAL rival, the BBC. Lets have more investment in quality UK-created drama on Sky One, and in the process see Sky 1 emerge as Britains answer to HBO. Lets also encourage Sky to continue investing in minority programming (like its excellent Arts strands). Lets encourage Sky to use its profits wisely and leave it alone in terms of further damaging regulation.
Reply With Quote
Junior Member
secaspider's Avatar
Posts: 22

Level: 3 [♥ Bé-Yêu ♥♥ Bé-Yêu ♥]
Life: 0 / 60
Magic: 7 / 1688
Experience: 41%

Thanks: 17
Thanked 6 Times in 3 Posts
Join Date: Oct 2008
07-October-2008, 18:20

Thank you very much for the new.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Forum Jump

ECS on RSS ECS on Twitter ECS on Facebook ECS on Youtube
Follow us on:

Powered by vBulletin
Copyright 2002 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.