Go Back   Eurocardsharing > General Discussions > General Satellite News > Latest Satellite News

Latest Satellite News Discussion, Update Who owns the digital home? at General Satellite News forum; Who owns the digital home? A Rapid TV News Round Table which focused on Conditional Access security in the home ...

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Update Who owns the digital home?
Bacteria's Avatar
Posts: 96,015

Level: 124 [♥ Bé-Yêu ♥♥ Bé-Yêu ♥♥ Bé-Yêu ♥♥ Bé-Yêu ♥♥ Bé-Yêu ♥]
Life: 4638 / 4638
Magic: 32005 / 102636
Experience: 68%

Thanks: 1,107
Thanked 5,578 Times in 1,419 Posts
Join Date: Oct 2006
Age: 37
Update Who owns the digital home? - 05-February-2009, 11:40

Who owns the digital home?

A Rapid TV News Round Table which focused on Conditional Access security in the home saw panellists urge caution in a rush towards common standards for anti-piracy measures.

David Whittaker, director/Business Development & Advance Technologies at NDS, and Ivan Verbesselt, SVP at Nagravision, part of the Kudelski Group, participated in the Rapid Round Table. Normally the two are tough commercial rivals in the CA market, but showed a remarkable amount of agreement at the Round Table that went well beyond the usual business courtesies. Both agreed that common standards were vital to progress in underpinning broadcasting security. [The standards] are very advantageous but we do have a view that the actual secret essence, which is the aspect of the security itself, the techniques of deployment should be standardised but the actual specific secrets should not, because if those secrets are standardised they are much more likely to be compromised, stated David Whittaker.

Nagras Ivan Verbesselt agreed, but warned that the industry was naively over-standardising, and this was potentially dangerous. I know specifically in our industry theres a real risk there of just walking along with naivety and assuming that someone else is going to solve the issues.

Specifically, Verbesselt was concerned about the core function of Conditional Access, and the inevitable risk from piracy. What we all know, and its a reality of our business, is that piracy is a reality in our business and any security infrastructure has a certain lifetime, a certain life cycle, and within that lifetime operators need to make money. This is just what the whole service is about, and companies like us are primarily there to extend that life cycle to what is economically viable, if you compare it to the investment.

He adds that if attempts are made to standardise to this level there are risks. At one point youll have to make sure that you re-secure a system which is maybe getting at the end of its lifetime, so how do you do that? You will do that either practically, because you feel that you may want to secure it even before a tipping point of piracy [occurs], or when the tipping point is there you may want to make sure its just controlled again. Well, who is going to take ownership? If the whole knowledge and the whole in-depth knowledge of what is being secured is owned not by a company - and a company alongside an operator - but by a consortium or even a whole industry, who is going to take ownership? To me it looks like a very thinly spread form of ownership, which is just no ownership at all.
Reply With Quote


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Forum Jump

ECS on RSS ECS on Twitter ECS on Facebook ECS on Youtube
Follow us on:

Powered by vBulletin
Copyright 2002 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.